Some buzz has recently been generated around Jimmy Wales’s apparent move to search engine business with Wikia Search. While it has been argued that, especially with the reported gamings of Digg and similar services, introducing a human element to online search is sure to introduce also attempts to artificially work the system, others assert that such gaming is already at play with also traditional search engines and the wiki-style approach would help to make such attempts more transparent and traceable. Also, the absence of me-focus in search engine participation raises doubts of what would be the motivation for the crowds to participate in largely anonymous search engine function where the 15-megabytes of fame doesn’t apply.
At same time, however, a new form of searching strongly related to the wiki-approach has already begun to establish itself alongside traditional search. That is, searching for content by tags on sites that serve specific kind of content. This is made possible by more and more companies adopting the tagging and folksonomy ideology of categorizing content. The approach works best when the searcher already knows in what format the desired content is needed. For example, if I want to search for presentations on building social applications on the web, my first alternative is not Google, but slideshare.net. If I need info on where people go to for brainstorming techniques, I use del.icio.us first, not Google. Same naturally goes for videos (YouTube), images (Flickr), etc. Of course I can use Google afterwards for further exploration, but it is not anymore the de facto standard. Furthermore, I notice using Google on many occasions to search for content which is already in some way familiar to me (e.g. an article whose title I remember) and simply want to obtain the specific URL it resides in. With more explorative goals, I use various format-specific (technorati for blogs, etc.) channels laterally.
In my opinion, this kind of search definitely complements, rather than challenges algorithm-based search engines, such as Google’s and Yahoo’s. I believe that while the tag-related search on specific content formats will become stronger, algorithms will continue to do a good job in certain types of searches and both can and will co-exist in the future.

3 responses so far ↓
1 Riku Vassinen // May 4, 2007 at 1:26 pm
You have probably come across to this link about alternative search engines. Interesting list nevertheless:
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alt_search_engines_april07.php?2
Choose your weapon.
2 /personal » Blog Archive » Google - A find engine // May 10, 2007 at 8:04 am
[…] says he uses google to find links to pages he already knows and I attest to the same […]
3 sami.viitamaki // May 10, 2007 at 10:15 pm
More on social search: 50matches.com launches.
“We only crawl web sites that were bookmarked or voted for by people, in sites like del.icio.us, digg and reddit.
They link to sites with the best content, and it gives you the best quality search engine on the web.
You can also call it Social Powered Search.”
http://www.50matches.com/
Leave a Comment